V-TUF TUFVAC 110V M-Class vs Hilti VC 40 MX 110V | M-Class Dust Extractor Comparison

Where the TUFVAC30M110 leads

• 35L vs 30L tank capacity — 17% more collection volume than the Hilti VC 40 MX. On a busy construction site this directly reduces the frequency of emptying and keeps productivity higher during extended use.
• 1400W vs 1100–1200W motor — higher motor power for demanding site applications. The TUFVAC's 1400W motor provides more reserve capacity for sustained heavy-duty dust extraction.
• 67 dB vs 77.7 dB noise level — a 10.7 dB difference is significant. Noise level is logarithmic — 77.7 dB is perceived as substantially louder than 67 dB. In occupied environments, healthcare settings or noise-sensitive sites the TUFVAC's lower noise is a material operational advantage.
• Wet and dry capability — both machines handle wet pick-up. One machine covers multiple site cleaning applications.
• Automatic filter cleaning — both machines have automatic filter cleaning to maintain suction performance.
• Heavy-duty construction — designed for hire fleet durability and construction site use.

Where the Hilti VC 40 MX has advantages

• 71–74 L/s published airflow — Hilti's published airflow figure is higher than V-TUF's stated 59 L/s. This figure is under verification — contact V-TUF on 01522 787978 to confirm current specification before making a purchasing decision where airflow is the primary criterion.
• 7m cable vs not stated — Hilti publishes a 7m cable length giving defined reach from a transformer or power point. V-TUF does not publish this figure — contact V-TUF to confirm.
• 14.4 kg vs 15.5 kg — marginally lighter at 1.1 kg difference. Minimal practical difference for most applications.
• Up to 1200W power tool socket output — Hilti publishes the maximum tool socket output. V-TUF does not state this figure — contact V-TUF to confirm compatibility with your specific power tool.