V-TUF AEROMAX500 & AEROMAX800 vs Dustcontrol DC AirCube 500 | Air Scrubber Comparison

V-TUF AEROMAX500 & AEROMAX800 vs Dustcontrol DC AirCube 500 — Air Scrubber

Comparing the V-TUF AEROMAX500 and AEROMAX800 air scrubbers against the Dustcontrol DC AirCube 500 110V for construction dust control, asbestos enclosure air filtration, refurbishment containment and ICRA compliance applications.


Full specification comparison

Specification V-TUF AEROMAX500 V-TUF AEROMAX800 Dustcontrol DC AirCube 500
Airflow 520 m³/h (306 CFM) 1,188 m³/h (700 CFM) 300–500 m³/h
HEPA Classification H13/H14 H13 H13
Filtration Stages 3 Stage 2–3 Stage 2 Stage
Pre-Filter G4 Included G4 Included Standard
Speed Control Single Speed Variable Speed Variable Speed
Power Consumption 158W 220W 200–300W
Noise Level 65 dB 60–65 dB Not Published
Weight 18kg 15kg 15–17kg
Housing Stainless Steel Rotomoulded Plastic Steel

AEROMAX500 — key advantages

  • H13/H14 HEPA options — the AEROMAX500 is available with H13 or H14 HEPA filtration. H14 provides 99.995% particle capture at 0.3 microns — the higher specification for asbestos enclosure air filtration and ICRA Type C/D environments.
  • 3-stage filtration — G4 pre-filter extends HEPA filter life significantly. The DC AirCube 500 uses a 2-stage system.
  • 158W power consumption — lowest running cost in this comparison. On long-term deployments the energy saving is significant.
  • Stainless steel housing — more durable for hire fleet environments than plastic-bodied alternatives. Easier to decontaminate after asbestos enclosure use.
  • 65 dB noise level — suitable for occupied environments including healthcare settings where noise is a compliance consideration.

AEROMAX800 — key advantages

  • 1,188 m³/h airflow — more than double the AEROMAX500 and well above the DC AirCube 500 maximum. Right specification for large enclosures, open-plan refurbishment areas and negative pressure containment on larger projects.
  • Variable speed control — airflow adjustable to match enclosure size and project requirement.
  • 15kg lightweight — easiest to move between work areas at only 15kg.
  • 60–65 dB noise — quieter than many air scrubbers at this airflow capacity.

Which air scrubber for which application

AEROMAX500 — medium enclosures, ICRA, asbestos where H14 required

520 m³/h with H13/H14 HEPA and stainless housing makes the AEROMAX500 the right specification for asbestos licensed work enclosures, ICRA Type C and D healthcare environments, and medium-sized refurbishment containment areas. See: ICRA guidance | CAR 2012

AEROMAX800 — large enclosures and open-plan refurbishment

1,188 m³/h variable speed makes the AEROMAX800 the specification for large open-plan refurbishment projects, bigger asbestos enclosures and commercial building dust control where air change rate over a large volume is the primary requirement.

DC AirCube 500 — established alternative

The Dustcontrol DC AirCube 500 is a well-established air scrubber. The AEROMAX500 matches or exceeds its specification on airflow, filtration class and energy consumption while adding stainless housing and 3-stage filtration. The DC AirCube 500 adds variable speed control that the AEROMAX500 single-speed does not offer.


Related pages

All V-TUF comparisons  AEROMAX1200 vs DC 1200  ICRA guidance  CAR 2012  H-Class extraction  Healthcare hub


Telephone: 01522 787978 | Email: enquiries@v-tuf.com