V-TUF XR3000 vs XRR3500 vs Numatic WVD570 | 110V Site Vacuum Comparison

V-TUF XR3000 vs XRR3500 vs Numatic WVD570-2 — 110V Site Vacuum

Comparing the V-TUF XR3000-110, V-TUF XRR3500-110 and Numatic WVD570-2 110V 32A site vacuums across airflow, capacity, weight, filtration and construction site suitability.


Full specification comparison

Specification V-TUF XR3000-110 V-TUF XRR3500-110 Numatic WVD570-2 110V
Motor Power 1700W 1100W 1060W
Airflow 106 L/sec 106 L/sec 49 L/sec
Suction 250 mbar 250 mbar 235–255 mbar
Wet Capacity 30L 30L 15L
Dry Capacity 30L 30L 23L
Weight 10kg 10kg 16kg
Cable Length 5m 5m 10m
Hose Diameter 38mm 38mm 38mm
Filtration Washable HEPA (Bagless) Washable HEPA (Bagless) HepaFlo Bag System
Motor Type Single High-Performance Turbine Single High-Performance Turbine Twin Motor
Construction Roto-Moulded (70% Recycled) Blow-Moulded (70% Recycled) Structofoam Body

Why the XR3000 leads this comparison

  • 106 L/sec airflow vs 49 L/sec — the XR3000 delivers more than double the airflow of the Numatic WVD570 at comparable machine size. That's the single most important performance figure for construction site vacuum use.
  • 10kg vs 16kg — the XR3000 is 37% lighter than the WVD570. Easier to carry up stairs, load into vans and move around site.
  • 30L wet capacity vs 15L — double the wet recovery volume of the Numatic.
  • Bagless HEPA filtration — no ongoing bag consumable cost. The Numatic HepaFlo bag system adds a running cost that compounds over a hire fleet's lifetime.
  • 70% recycled plastic construction — sustainability credentials without compromising durability.
  • 1700W single turbine motor — higher power delivery than the Numatic's twin 1060W configuration for demanding site applications.

Which machine for which application

XR3000-110 — high-performance compact site vacuum

The XR3000 is the right specification for contractors who need maximum airflow in a lightweight, bagless package. 106 L/sec from a 10kg machine is exceptional performance for a 110V site vacuum. Construction clean-down, tool connection dust extraction, site tidying.

XRR3500-110 — same airflow, lower motor power

The XRR3500 delivers the same 106 L/sec airflow and 30L capacity as the XR3000 at lower motor power (1100W). Right specification where lower power draw is a site constraint.

Numatic WVD570-2 — longer cable reach

The Numatic's 10m cable gives greater reach from a single 110V transformer outlet. Where cable reach is the primary constraint and airflow performance is secondary, the WVD570 has a practical advantage. However the 49 L/sec airflow is significantly below the XR3000 for most construction applications.


Related pages

All V-TUF comparisons  Construction hub  M-Class extraction  XR11000 vs WVD900 comparison


Telephone: 01522 787978 | Email: enquiries@v-tuf.com